首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of EDTA and Sodium Citrate on hormone measurements by fluorometric (FIA) and immunofluorometric (IFMA) methods
【2h】

Effects of EDTA and Sodium Citrate on hormone measurements by fluorometric (FIA) and immunofluorometric (IFMA) methods

机译:EDTA和柠檬酸钠对荧光法(FIA)和免疫荧光法(IFMA)测量激素的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Background Measurements of hormonal concentrations by immunoassays using fluorescent tracer substance (Eu3+) are susceptible to the action of chemical agents that may cause alterations in its original structure. Our goal was to verify the effect of two types of anticoagulants in the hormone assays performed by fluorometric (FIA) or immunofluorometric (IFMA) methods. Methods Blood samples were obtained from 30 outpatients and were drawn in EDTA, sodium citrate, and serum separation Vacutainer®Blood Collection Tubes. Samples were analyzed in automatized equipment AutoDelfia™ (Perkin Elmer Brazil, Wallac, Finland) for the following hormones: Luteinizing hormone (LH), Follicle stimulating homone (FSH), prolactin (PRL), growth hormone (GH), Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), insulin, C peptide, total T3, total T4, free T4, estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, and cortisol. Statistical analysis was carried out by Kruskal-Wallis method and Dunn's test. Results No significant differences were seen between samples for LH, FSH, PRL and free T4. Results from GH, TSH, insulin, C peptide, SHBG, total T3, total T4, estradiol, testosterone, cortisol, and progesterone were significant different between serum and EDTA-treated samples groups. Differences were also identified between serum and sodium citrate-treated samples in the analysis for TSH, insulin, total T3, estradiol, testosterone and progesterone. Conclusions We conclude that the hormonal analysis carried through by FIA or IFMA are susceptible to the effects of anticoagulants in the biological material collected that vary depending on the type of assay.
机译:摘要背景使用荧光示踪物质(Eu3 +)进行免疫测定来测量激素浓度易受化学试剂作用的影响,这可能会导致其原始结构发生变化。我们的目标是验证两种抗凝剂在通过荧光(FIA)或免疫荧光(IFMA)方法进行的激素测定中的作用。方法从30位门诊患者中采集血液样本,并在EDTA,柠檬酸钠和血清分离管中进行采集。在自动化设备AutoDelfia™(Perkin Elmer巴西,瓦拉克,芬兰)中对以下激素进行了分析:黄体生成激素(LH),促卵泡激素(FSH),催乳素(PRL),生长激素(GH),性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG),甲状腺刺激激素(TSH),胰岛素,C肽,总T3,总T4,游离T4,雌二醇,孕酮,睾丸激素和皮质醇。通过Kruskal-Wallis方法和Dunn检验进行统计分析。结果LH,FSH,PRL和游离T4样品之间无显着差异。血清和EDTA处理的样品组之间的GH,TSH,胰岛素,C肽,SHBG,总T3,总T4,雌二醇,睾丸激素,皮质醇和孕酮的结果显着不同。在分析TSH,胰岛素,总T3,雌二醇,睾丸激素和孕激素时,血清和柠檬酸钠处理的样品之间也存在差异。结论我们得出的结论是,FIA或IFMA进行的激素分析易受所收集生物材料中抗凝剂作用的影响,抗凝剂的作用因测定类型而异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号